← View all use cases

FINANCE · EVIDENCE AND CRITERIA

The next close should not have to rebuild the last one.

Finance teams work with evidence, procedures, exceptions, and criteria that change across periods. PRAITO ONE can carry authorized context and references forward without replacing accounting checks or audit judgment.

Audit diagram connecting evidence, exceptions, and conclusions through provenance.

What financial context gets lost between periods

A number on its own does not explain its source, the criterion applied, or the exception that led to a review.

01

Evidence without a reading trail

Workpapers, references, and conclusions can be scattered, making it hard to trace which version supported a finding.

02

Exceptions that never reach the procedure

A one-off adjustment can return as a question because its rationale and scope were not preserved beside the criterion.

03

Criteria mistaken for facts

A provisional assumption or prior-period decision must not be presented as current policy without checking source, date, and approval.

How a finance Company Brain could grow

The thread should preserve the relationship between procedure, evidence, and conclusion, along with the relevant period and context.

01

1 · Bounded work

The team frames a review for the permitted period, entity, or project, using context available to that task.

02

2 · Evidence and exception

A decision identifies the references consulted, the rule applied, the exception, and anything still requiring verification.

03

3 · Summary by period

If an authorized feature permits it, saved knowledge can retain the procedure or criterion with its period, origin, validity, and who may see it.

04

4 · Next reporting cycle

In the next cycle, the team retrieves only what it may use and revalidates dates, data, and references; prior balances or rules are not assumed to remain current.

FICTIONAL · ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE

An exception is explained before the next close.

  1. 01

    Review

    During a close, an analyst reviews an expense with the team and references already authorized for that project.

  2. 02

    Conclusion

    The lead records the criterion applied, evidence reviewed, and condition that would make the same treatment inappropriate again.

  3. 03

    Traceability

    An authorized summary may keep the procedure, period, and references together without turning a provisional conclusion into a general rule.

  4. 04

    Next period

    Months later, another person with permission finds the reasoning and checks current sources before deciding again.

What finance could recover over the years

Well-organized continuity can surface prior reasoning; it does not replace current evidence, professional judgment, or audit.

01

Procedures and controls

Reconciliation, review, and approval steps that remain current and have checkable sources.

02

Period-specific evidence

Which reference supported a conclusion and the period, entity, and context it was limited to.

03

Known exceptions

Adjustments, reservations, and treatment decisions alongside reasons to review them again.

04

Open questions

Changes in criteria, documents to validate, and conclusions whose current validity could not be confirmed.

Financial context stays separate from the model.

PRAITO ONE uses models from providers; it is not its own AI model. Company Brain is lasting, controlled company knowledge kept outside the model. Changing engines neither changes authorization nor validates old figures.

Conversations do not automatically train any model. Access to documents, connected sources, and periods depends on enabled features and permissions; reuse must retain evidence, limits, and validity.

Other contexts where traceability and exceptions matter

View all use cases →

Explore PRAITO ONE with a bounded review.

Work with a procedure or question you can use within the chosen context; verify every figure and source with the responsible team.

Try PRAITO ONE